From
TSV Hari
Southern
Features & News Service Exclusive
Chennai, January 13
[SFNS]: Tamil Nadu’s All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam [AIADMK] regime is
in serious trouble. Emerging newer and hitherto unknown aspects of the ‘sudden
death’ of the late Chief Minister Jayalalithaa have
cast a vain shadow on the machinations of the sinister General
Secretary on probation
VK Sasikala and her behind-the-scenes-string-puller
husband Natarajan.
Suspicions of foul-play in Jaya’s ‘unexplained’
death after 75 days’ ‘intense treatment’ at Apollo Hospital have surfaced. They
could lead to a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation, top sources said.
Sources close to Apollo boss Pratap C Reddy revealed that
he is mulling the institution’s washing its hands off the imbroglio in his
written deposition to the court.
Jayalalithaa’s health was on the mend as is evident from our health bulletins. She could have left whenever she wanted to. Following this development, doctors from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences [AIIMS] and Dr Beale returned to Delhi and London respectively. What exactly took place during the last 2 days due to the activities of those
who controlled the access to the CM is unknown. Police officials had kept all
visitors – including the Governor and central ministers at bay earlier. Towards
the end, even most of the doctors’ entry was delayed under some pretext or
other. The alarm bells were pressed only when it was too late. The confusion over the time of death of the late CM, the leak of info, its denial and late-night confirmation of her passing are all indicative of the above aspects.
Hence, accusing the hospital of foul play is out of the question.
These are said to be sentences that could form the crux of Apollo’s sealed court deposition,
top sources told SFNS.
Two days prior to the fatal worsening of Jaya’s
health, Natarajan is said to have been given legal advice that if
the CM died, the appeal pending in the Apex Court against the exoneration of
Jaya, Sasikala and others could be rendered legally untenable.
“It was Natarajan’s
idea was that Sasikala would go scot-free and rule Tamil Nadu as its next CM.
Close relatives of the husband-wife duo could jockey themselves into positions of power. On that basis –
preparations
to get her sworn in were underway. The sudden application of brakes in the
progress of the Mannargudi
Mafia’s juggernaut is also due to other serious allegations against it. Apollo’s
attempts to wriggle out of the tricky situation lend logic to the charges when
juxtaposed to the health bulletins and the
unprecedented denial of entry to VVIPs – which includes the constitutional head
and acting governor CH Vidyasagar Rao," a senior cop wishing anonymity said.
The ramifications of
the above have raised too many eyebrows in New Delhi’s power-brokers’ cocktail
circuit, sources said. In turn, it is said to have led to the ‘indefinite postponement’ of Sasikala’s elevation to the CM’s post. The earlier
rumoured date was 12th January 2017.
The continuance of
Sasikala in Jaya’s posh Poes Garden residence sans a publicly declared will of the late CM have worsened the sinking feelings growing deeper in the Natarajan camp by the hour. The clamour for making Sasikala CM has slowed. Plan B to position Sasikala as the Sonia Gandhi of AIADMK is underway, informed sources told SFNS.
On a state-wide
basis, posters
featuring Sasikala as the ‘saviour’ are getting ripped incessantly.
Senior journalists in Chennai are
nonplussed over the sheer brazenness of Sasikala. [2]
[1]
The causes for what seems like the impending fall of the
AIADMK regime are given hereunder after consulting legal brains. The confusing
legalese has been left out.
Sasikala’s continuing to reside in ‘Veda Nilayam’ is the deadliest of
the giveaways.
Wills and/or
testaments and/or covenants authored by Jayalalithaa are yet to be read out.
Before long someone
could question under what authority is her former aide lording it over the late
CM’s residence.
“Unless Sasikala
has some documentation she would not brazenly take up residence in Veda
Nilayam. When the question is asked by the late distant CM’s blood relatives,
Sasikala could arguably produce a document purporting to render her stay legal
and official. Such a move would be like dealing oneself 5 aces in a deck of
four for the following reasons," sources said.
Such wills/testaments/covenants need to have signatures primarily of the
owner of the property and or properties. If Sasikala produces such a document,
its signature could be questioned as even the nominations of those who
contested the by-elections only had the thumb impression of Jayalalithaa –
while she was in Apollo Hospital. The follow-up question to the existence of
such a document would be – why did the late CM sign the will and not the
nomination papers. There can be no answers to that.
The
second question could be about the secrecy of Jaya’s stay in hospital.
Persons
holding constitutional authority like the officiating Governor CH Vidyasagar
Rao were not allowed to see the CM in person.
Precedents like the treatment undergone by Jaya’s mentor – late CM MG Ramachandran in the US of A and the conspicuous absence of the same in the case of Jaya could prove
a clear pointer.
Privacy reasons justifying non-issuance of health bulletins were morally and legally
acceptable when Jaya was alive. Posthumously, such tales cannot hold water
in courts. Seized of the matter, the Madras High Court has asked the hospital
authorities, the state and central regimes for their explanations, a top lawyer opined.
At
this point in time, the centre can wash its hands off saying it respected the
privacy of the lady in question and accepted the credibility of hospital’s
health bulletins. The hospital too could legally pass the buck, the advocate added.
But,
the state government – that had been headed by Jaya till her last breath
cannot. The cabinet is collectively responsible for decision[s] affecting the
state’s political future and the future lives of the state’s citizens.
The
absence of a will, the presence of thumb impressions on the nomination papers
of candidates during by elections and the continuous flip-flops by hospital
authorities on the state of health the CM could lead to the court ordering the
exhumation of Jaya’s body for a post mortem, is another startling point of view.
Second
guessing the posthumous final diagnosis is an asinine exercise. But, even if it
does produce a result to prove that Jaya’s vitalstatistics are indeed intact,
the question as to why none was allowed to see her when all was well with her
could assume gigantic and unanswerable proportions, goes an jurist's observation.
Sasikala
could stymie the performance of such a hypothetical order of the Madras High
Court saying ‘cutting up the remains of Amma would be sacrilege’. The result,
in case she succeeds in such an exercise, the conversion of the matter
into a trial in the High Court would be inevitable. Such a scenario could prove to be disastrous to Sasikala
and co as the gang seems to have no answers to most questions, political observers felt.
After
the demise of Jaya, the Damocles’ Sword of the Disproportionate Assets [DA]
case continues to hang over the head of Sasikala.
It is plain as pikestaff to anyone and everyone that the
conviction of Jaya had not been set aside. Her demise emancipated her from
the clutches of what could have been a painful aftermath. The gaffes of
Karnataka High Court judge Kumaraswamy’s calculator could cause the fall of a
political guillotine blade on the neck of Sasikala, sending her to prison as decided by Sessions
Judge DaCunha. That is one aspect that needs close scrutiny, informed sources felt.
Getting
a judgement set aside in the High Court is one thing, staying out on bail on
the basis of Supreme Court orders is another. A pending appeal when the protective VVIP is alive and in hospital was a third, but eminently workable proposition. However, when a Division Bench of the Madras High Court has begun raising serious doubts about the final days of Jayalalithaa, the possibility of the Supreme Court being lenient on Sasikala can only be termed a miracle. While one cannot predict the Apex Court's final denouement, the hypothetical conviction by the SC could gum up Sasikala’s dream-works
of being the political boss of Tamil Nadu. In such a scenario, those who are begging Sasikala to save the AIADMK would end up demanding her ouster for the same purpose.
The
reasoning is simple.
The
imbroglio could result in some AIADMK legislators crossing the floor, and/or
simply voting against the regime and/or abstaining in case of any serious
motion being moved in the state assembly with telling timing.
To
overcome such doomsday predictions, Sasikala has many hurdles to cross. Here
are the 3 important ones:
Beating the Madras High Court’s
hypothetical heat over the final days of Jaya in Apollo;
Documentation justifying her stay
in Poes Gardens passing legal muster;
Overcoming adverse ruling by the Supreme Court in the DA case.
Overcoming adverse ruling by the Supreme Court in the DA case.
Is Sasikala
capable of completing the 3 important Herculean tasks? Former Chief Secretary Ram Mohan Rao is still smarting under the slur on him post the raids. Many believe that it was Sasikala who provided the info against Rao to ingratiate herself to the Arun Jaitley camp within the BJP. Rumours are afoot indicating that Rao is gathering ammo to return Sasikala's compliment.
Only time
can provide an answer to such possibilities.
There is an
indication of the disaster waiting to happen.
Deals
abhorred by Jaya – especially the one concerning the UDAY scheme to streamline
power supply was signed a month after the late CM was laid to rest.
Chief
Minister J Jayalalithaa had opposed many of its conditions, particularly the
directive to revise electricity tariff once in three months to offset fuel
price changes. Till the time of her death, Jaya had given no
indication of her readiness to sign the deal. Murmurs are being heard about Sasikala going against every known principle dear to Jayalalithaa to curry favour with those in power at the centre. The next 'aye' could be that of the GST bill - another piece of legislation opposed by Jaya when she had been alive and active.
Foul acts and
conspiracies leading to capture of power is nothing new to the Dravidian
parties.
After the
death of DMK founder Conjeevaram Natarajan Annadurai on February 3 1969,
Karunanidhi’s ascent to power was rife with deals, conspiracies and a lot
worse.
Relevant
excerpts from the Wikipedia
dossier:
After Anna’s death, there was a serious power tussle between M Karunanidhi and V. R. Nedunchezhiyan. Most
of the elected MLAs of DMK, including leaders like Mathialagan, Nanjil
Manoharan and the celluloid hero MGR favoured Karunanidhi as CM in preference
to Nedunchezhiyan, the senior leader after Anna. To pacify V. R. Nedunchezhiyan a new post called party president was created for M
Karunanidhi and V. R.
Nedunchezhiyan was given the post of general secretary. MGR was
appointed as the Treasurer.
The political feud between MGR and the party president
Karunanidhi came to the fore after Karunanidhi called himself “Mujib of Tamil Nadu”. MGR alleged large scale
corruption by Karunanidhi. He was eventually suspended from the party’s General
Council. A new party – All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) emerged.
Jayalalithaa was manhandled by
members of MGR’s family and her political rivals, she claimed.
Operative excerpts
from a relevant press interview given by Jayalalithaa:
In the early hours of December 24 a friend gave me the
shocking news of MGR being no more. I rushed immediately to MGR’s residence. Initially,
I was not allowed inside. Then, I spotted the ambulance with MGR’s body inside.
My driver was instructed to chase the car and not allow any other vehicle to
come in between. When the body lay in state at Rajaji Hall I stood by my leader’s
side for 13 hours the first day and 8 hours the second day. During this time, 7
or 8 ladies stamped on my feet, drove their nails into my skin and pinched me.
When I tried to join the funeral procession and board the gun-carriage with
soldiers’ assistance, Tamil film actor Deepan, Janaki’s younger brother’s son
hit me on the forehead, pushed me, beat me, kicked me and threw me out. I was
injured and bruised all over my body. I sent identical telegrams to the Governor,
the chief secretary, and to the director-general of police.
The charge
had led to the split in the AIADMK.
After
Jaya’s death, the similar imbroglio has turned up like a bad penny yet again –
as the succession war is getting dirtier by the day. Sasikala claims total
support by legislators elected on the AIADMK ticket. But, the cadres continue
to rip party posters that feature the face of the former aide of Jaya.
Posters of Sasikala have been found
vandalised in some parts of the state, including Chennai. The ripped off
posters were found on Greenways Road, near ministers' official bungalows and
Lloyds Road, near the AIADMK headquarters. The root cause for the simmering
anger against Sasikala was that she had been the lone attendant of Jayalalithaa
and did not let supporters know her health status. Not even a single photograph
of Jayalalithaa was released like it was done when party founder MGR was
hospitalized, cadres said.
Sasikala has a challenger in the
form of Deepa Jayakumar, Jayalalithaa’s niece.
To sum it
all up, Dravidian parties’ succession dramas can be divided into two parts – by
apparent conspiracy and through the popular route.
MGR took
the popular route, worked the crowds for nearly 5 years after being sacked from
the DMK to capture power.
In 1987, after her mentor MGR's death, the thespian politician’s
protĂ©gĂ© – Jayalalithaa initially opted for the conspiracy route and later took the popular route after his widow Janaki allowed the merger of the two AIADMK factions. It was the aftermath of a reportedly shameful attempt to disrobe Jaya on the floors of state assembly by the DMK legislator Durai Murugan.
Jaya never
possessed the charisma of the late MGR.
But, thanks
to the sizeable fame acquired as the long standing female foil of MGR during
her celluloid career, Jaya emerged victorious during the 1991 elections.
Clearly,
the two women – Sasikala and Deepa – fighting like Kilkenny cats for power –
aren’t blessed with any charisma – either that of MGR of that of Jaya.
Deepa
resembles Jaya, but, has an issue with her male sibling, who, till the time of
publication, seems to be in Sasikala’s camp.
Sans any
visible and viable fan following comparable to those of Jaya and/or MGR, the power hungry antics of Sasikala and Deepa could only land Tamil Nadu into the realm of coalition politics a la Kerala. With fissiparous elements on the prowl in TN, before long, it could lapse into a situation akin to Kashmir in the north.
Technically,
Sasikala is now calling the shots and ruling the roost.
But, what
seems easy and too good for Sasikala at this point in time has the propensity of turning out into a
bitter pill in Tamil Nadu politics.
If the centre’s Pongal gift to Tamil Nadu is a
probe into the activities of ‘Mannargudi Mafia’ by the CBI, Tamil Nadu’s politics would
change forever.
[2]
“History will not forgive those who are shamelessly
supporting the political upstart woman Sasikala
Natarajan. She has brazenly jockeyed herself into what seems like a
politically advantageous position breaking every known democratic tradition.
Answerable only to herself, her
occupation of Jayalalithaa’s Poes Garden residence poses serious legal and constitutional
questions. Congress
President Sonia Gandhi cashed in on the sympathy generated by the
murder of her husband and former PM Rajiv Gandhi two and a half decades ago.
One can say with credible evidence that the political blunders of the Congress
are responsible for India’s
headache – the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Sheer political opportunism on
the part of other regional outfits have worsened the situation to the extent
that the
nation’s enemies have dared to attack India’s air force base in Pathankot –
close to the border with Pakistan. The political horizon of Tamil
Nadu is pock-marked by regional parties whose leaders have espoused
secessionist causes time and again. Sasikala has successfully
copied the Sonia Gandhi formula of entering a political arena through
unconstitutional means. If she is allowed to retain control over the All
India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam [AIADMK] – something she clandestinely
wrested from the hands of an ailing Jayalalithaa – very soon Tamil Nadu could suffer the same fate as Kashmir on its southern shores,” opined columnist S Gurumurthy
during a series of private chats.
Thuglak and Junior Vikatan are two main Tamil language
periodicals, vehement in their criticism of Sasikala [61]. Till December 5 2016, Sasikala was a personal aide to the late Tamil Nadu
Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa. When she returned to Poes Garden after having been ousted in 2011, Sasikala put out a statement that she will only be a maid in the household of Jaya and not indulge in any political activity and/or recommend any officer's transfer or promotion. The questions now being asked is: What made her so important so suddenly after Jaya's somewhat mysterious demise?
Thuglak’s veteran
celebrity satirist editor Cho S Ramaswamy passed away on December 7 2016.
He had been stinging in his criticism against the double-standards of
politicians of all hues. In its previous avatar, Thuglak had been part of the Vikatan Group. Since
then, for long, it had been owned by Cho and his family. The ownership of the
weekly has changed hands. It is now part of the Kumudam Group.
Commentators
have found it convenient to dub exposure of ‘Dravidian’ outfits’ corrupt
underbellies as attempts by the Bharatiya Janata Party to capture power in
Tamil Nadu. Statements made by BJP VVIPs like Venkaiah Naidu that seem to be in support of Sasikala gang's machinations have only added grist to the rumour mills.
To ram their point home, media outlets’ alleged Brahmin
and upper-caste domination is used to point to fulcrums of an
anti-Dravidian bias amongst the elite.
Dwindling
vote-shares of second-rung political parties in Tamil Nadu have led to corrupt
politicians seeking short-cuts to cling on to lucrative power-retention
formulae based on casteist vote-bank-politics, opine intellectuals from
religious minorities with a nationalist-mindset.
“A facile method to sow fissiparous seeds is
abuse of the term ‘right-wing Hindu nationalist’. It is cleverly leveraged to propagate
anti-India propaganda and demolition of images of national icons like Mahatma
Gandhi. This trait is alarming. Pakistan has no legal status to stake any
claim on Kashmir, yet it does and political parties have been fishing in murky
waters of the Dal Lake getting muddier and bloodier by the minute. Similarly,
there was and is no basis for a separate Dravidian state – yet – parties that
sometime or other espoused such causes have held power in Tamil Nadu since
1967. Many may argue that DMK
founder Conjeevaram Natarajan Annadurai eschewed the separate Tamil Nadu slogan
in the late 50’s but Karunanidhi has kept the bogey alive all the time. MGR
and Jayalalithaa did not need such slogans as their popularity was far more
than those of Karunanidhi and the rest of the opposition put together. Nevertheless, both allowed such slogans continuance as some kind of a 'political insurance.' But,
after the demise of Jayalalithaa, in pathetic attempts to retain power in Tamil
Nadu, the likes of Sasikala and her husband Natarajan would stoop to any level
to maintain their stranglehold over the state,” said Aslam Sadiq [name changed]
who lives in a Muslim ghetto in Triplicane, a central Chennai urban compendium
of pigeon-hole like residences dotted by mosques.
“Those talking of Muslims being ill-treated and
yearning for Pakistan forget the heroism of Abdul
Hamid in the 65 war against the northwest invaders. Using imagery of past
injustices suffered by religious minorities to divide India is also
fashionable. Intellectual arrogance of better-informed sections of population
results in such shallow forces growing roots and driving thoughts inimical to
the unity and integrity of India deeper into abysmal depths,” Sadiq added.
A trenchant eye-opener of current Tamil Naadu po;oitoics on to boil and bubble on Ponggal Day 2017, and set to continue.
ReplyDeleteS Narayanaswamy
Thank you sir! A happy Pongal to you!
ReplyDeleteDear Sir,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the wonderful feature. It is eye-catching indeed. Yes, India should not become another J & K, as desired by the vested interests. Shashikala has done to Jayalalithaa, what the latter has done to MGR. When Jaya disowned the trusted men of MGR, little did she realise that she will be paid back on the same coin by Shashikala. When MGR could keep everybody, including Jaya at a distance. what was the need for the late CM to remain so close to her one-time buddy? When the senior AIADMK leader S.D. Somasundaram alleged corruption in the party and left in 1983, MGR was not ruffled. He always had a self-belief that when the masses are around him, he need not worry for even mind-boggling accusations against him. MGR was doubly sure, despite knowing his villainy background on certain issues, his committed and mass supporters never deserted him. They viewed more of his merits than of his shortcomings. Jayalalithaa, more or less, gained the masses support and backing, despite her umpteen drawbacks, in a way, similar to MGR. With that much backing around, she need not have worried for bullies like Sashikala, who cannot garner even one per cent of votes on their own. MGR was not flattered to deceive, whereas Jaya could be flattered, lured and deceived. MGR never over-rated himself when some sycophants tried to impress upon him with his popularity. Once ina particulasr election campaign he said, "here the Communists are more popular, I may be a popular film hero. How do you expect my party to win in this constituency." You cannot expect a similar statement from Jaya had been alive, let alone Sashikala. MGR never welcomed other politicians to fall on his feet and found logic in the version of others. One has to wait to see whether Deepa can match up the ulterior motivation of Sashikala and her better-half Natarajan. There is nothing new in Vikatan opposing Sashikala vehemently, as their deadly-foe Reporter has published an editorial in favour of Chinna Amma. In fact, Cho relied more on Vikatan than of Kumudam in the yesteryear, as the manner in which he fought against the imposition of S.S. Balasubramanian by the MGR Government. The financial compulsion, I suppose, could have endeared Cho towards Varadarajan and his Kumudam. Since Kumudam was a pro Jaya man, Vikatan had decided to oppose her and her regime. One small correction. When MGR floated the party in 1972, it was named as Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam(ADMK) and only later it was expanded to All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. Gurumurthy is perhaps right in stating that if things get drifted in Tamil Nadu politics, a day is not far off when it comes another Jammu & Kashmir. What is intriguing me is that we are blaming only the POK, but not the China-occupied Kashmir Aksaichin. Are we leaving the benefit of doubt to China, just like a large number of our politicians and political parties?
Thanks and regards,
Venugopal
Thank you, as always!
Delete