[580 words]
From TSV
Hari
Southern
Features & News Service Exclusive
Chennai, January 15
[SFNS]: Lavish praise from Prime
Minister Narendra Damodardas Modi etched the uniqueness of the late
journalist, satirist, dramatist and political guru Cho S Ramaswamy at the 47th
annual meet of the weekly news
magazine Thuglak here Saturday.
It was a major political event. Chennai's premier concert hall - the Music Academy was full. The crowd spilled on to the parking lot of the southern metropolis's Mecca of classical music.
“If someone has to write the political history of India, it cannot be done without including Cho Ramaswamy and his political commentary,” Modi observed.
“If someone has to write the political history of India, it cannot be done without including Cho Ramaswamy and his political commentary,” Modi observed.
Terming Cho’s December 7 demise a ‘personal loss,’
Modi pointed out that India had lost an intellectual “who offered invaluable
wisdom to whoever came his way.”
The
PM stressed on the Hindu scriptural and almanac-linked importance of January
14. By dovetailing the various nationwide important events on the Hindu
calendar, Modi subtly conveyed the message that Cho was a national figure.
Modi pointed out that Cho had incredibly turned
adversity to advantage. The instance of miscreants pelting eggs at the editor
who in turn asked his tormentors not waste them but supply omelettes instead
recalled by the PM had the audience in splits.
Paying encomiums to the magazine and its editor, Modi said,
“Thuglak had become a weapon against divisive forces”. “Cho would carry views hostile
and abusive of him in his magazine,” the PM added emphasising on the democratic
character of Cho.
India’s
highest paid ‘superstar’ Rajnikant supplied funny moments in a somewhat
restrained speech which also quietly touched on the financial brain of the late
editor and also of Cho’s successor –
auditor Swaminathan Gurumurthy.
“Several years ago, when cricket’s Indian Premier
League began, Cho advised me to buy the Chennai cricket team franchise –
then costing only a few lakhs. I turned it down. I now know it is worth
several thousand crores,” the thespian said, causing commentator Sumant C Raman –
seated in the front row to squirm.
Raman has been supportive of one of cricket’s modern-day
alleged villains – N Srinivasan.
Chennai Super Kings,
the team owned by disgraced cricket administrator N Srinivasan continues facing
a 2-year
ban imposed by the courts. In this connection, India’s former
skipper MS Dhoni and maverick
politician Dr Subramanian Swamy had recently met Srinivasan – whose firm India
Cements is said to be close to decision-makers of the main Tamil Nadu
opposition party – the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam.
It was the turn of RSS ideologue Gurumurthy to frown
when Rajnikant made a clear reference to the “consultation charges” of the
auditor. “People faint when they hear the figure,” the actor said.
In his acceptance speech, Gurumurthy
pointed out that Rajnikant is India’s highest paid actor. “When compared to
what Rajnikant charges for a movie, my fees would be a very minor figure.
For me, editing Thuglak could entail lesser income. But, it is a historically
necessitated responsibility bequeathed to me by Cho,” Gurumurthy averred.
The new owner of Thuglak – Varadarajan
– who runs the successful Kumudam
Group had his tense moments as well.
Without naming the state’s political
upstart Sasikala, Gurumurthy revealed that ‘friends were advising to take
it easy’ on the ongoing political imbroglio in Tamil Nadu.
Significantly, Kumudam group’s weekly “Reporter” has a
soft editorial stance towards TN’s indirect ruler VK Sasikala and her husband
Natarajan – which is diametrically opposite to the line being pursued by
Gurumurthy.
Speaking from a prepared
speech in English, The Hindu scion N Ravi recalled two instances of Cho’s humorous
methods of journalism that disarmed his adversaries.
When the crowd began
melting, a few journalists were heard remarking in a cynical tone that that ‘though a PM in harness addressing a homage meet of magazine editor was unprecedented, the
political milking of the apolitical Cho’s legacy had begun’.
RM/M/KMT/TSV
SFNS is a news service with a difference. News is narrated succinctly
and in detail - for the reader to understand - every event it its complete
perspective.
for
further details: haritsv@hotmail.com
dear hari sir, nicely narrated Thuglak weekly magazine's annual function.
ReplyDeleteThanks a ton!
ReplyDeleteDear Sir,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the wonderful piece on Cho after the Thuglak anniversary. Modi is right perhaps in stating that political history cannot be written without the contribution of Cho as a political commentator. Rajankinant's speech marked the centre of attraction. He should have listened to Cho and opted for the purchases of CSK franchise. Gurumurthy, if one goes through the earlier Thuglak issues was reluctant to accept the Editor post in Thuglak, considering the money and time factor. Like Cho, he is all rolled into one, but it seems, Gurumurthy is under the apprehension that Thgulak work will prevent him from earning adequate money from his other interests. About the Hindu, Cho always had a grievance that they have not reported the proceedings when Thuglak magazines were seized by the DMK regime before the 1971 Lok Sabha and assembly elections. Cho wrote, how even Vali and M.S. Viswanathan had to work for his film 'Mohammed Bin Thuglak' under tremendous pressure from MGR, as the DMK was united then. Valli even went to the extent of telling him that he cannot incur the wrath of MGR for his sake. Kumudam Varadarajan, is also known for his double-tongue. If one goes through the Kumudam editorial or articles, it is careful in not antagonising Stalin, but will project Karunanidhi as their deadly-foe. Varadarajan's opposition to Karunanidhi is mostly due to the latter's support to his one-time partner 'Jawahar Palaniappan', if I am not wrong. We knew, how in 1970s and 1980s, especially during the tenure Indira Gandhi, Kumudam and Thuglak were at loggerheads. Many times were confused at that time over the editorial stance of both the weeklies. If Kumudam went out of the way to defend Indira and Sanjay Gandhi, Thuglak saw to it that they were opposed vehemently. It seems, Varadarajan's father, Parthasarathy was a staunch admirer of Indira Gandhi. Cho never believed in celebration of birthdays and observance of death days, as according to him, there was nothing special in it, as we are supposed to born on any particular day. Why should not Rajanikant, Gurumurthy and Varadarajan follow is austerity measure by staring with shunning aside birthdays. It is true that nobody can replace the indispensable Cho in Thuglak, but if Gurumurthy is not inclined to continue, it is better for some other staffer to take the mantle on his shoulder, as a mark of tribute to Cho, whose loss is irreparable to the nation. The readers will be missing his columns, especially, question-answer badly, but whether we like it or not, the reality cannot be disowned.
Thanks and regards,
Venu
Thank you, Venu, as always you are very kind to me
Delete